WIKIPEDIA, THE FREE ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIA THAT CAN BE EDITED BY ANYONE, ASKS FOR DONATIONS SEVERAL TIMES THROUGHOUT THE YEAR AND HOLIDAY SEASON IS ONE OF THOSE TIMES.
HOWEVER, TESLA AND SPACEX CEO ELON MUSK IS NOW URGING HIS FOLLOWERS ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM ‘X’ – NOT TO DONATE TO THE COLLABORATIVE PLATFORM SAYING: “STOP DONATING TO WOKEPEDIA UNTIL THEY RESTORE BALANCE TO THEIR EDITING AUTHORITY”
THE POST COMES AFTER THE WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION DID A BREAKDOWN OF THEIR 2023-2024 SPENDING GOAL AND REVEALED $50 MILLION DOLLARS SPENT ON EQUITY, SAFETY AND INCLUSION.
“SUPPORTING EQUITY REPRESENTS THE SECOND LARGEST PART OF OUR PROGRAMMATIC WORK,” THE NON-PROFIT SAID ON ITS WEBSITE.
WIKIPEDIA HAS CLAIMED ITS WEBSITE IS NON-PARTISAN, HOWEVER, THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE CONDUCTED A STUDY ON WIKIPEDIA’S POLITICAL BIASES AND FOUND “WE FIND A MILD TO MODERATE TENDENCY IN WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES TO ASSOCIATE PUBLIC FIGURES IDEOLOGICALLY ALIGNED RIGHT-OF-CENTER WITH MORE NEGATIVE SENTIMENT THAN PUBLIC FIGURES IDEOLOGICALLY ALIGNED LEFT-OF-CENTER.”
THE JUNE REPORT ALSO FOUND “PREVAILING ASSOCIATIONS OF NEGATIVE EMOTIONS (E.G., ANGER AND DISGUST) WITH RIGHT-LEANING PUBLIC FIGURES; AND POSITIVE EMOTIONS (E.G., JOY) WITH LEFT-LEANING PUBLIC FIGURES.”
IN AN INTERVIEW WITH THE TELEGRAPH LAST YEAR, WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER JIMMY WALES DENIED WIKIPEDIA IS “WOKE” BUT DID ACKNOWLEDGE THAT HIS ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIA IS NOT IMMUNE TO CRITICISMS RELATED TO BIAS, PARTICULARLY IN ITS EDITORIAL PROCESSES.
WIKIPEDIA HAS COME UNDER FIRE IN RECENT YEARS, FACING VARIOUS CRITICISMS RELATED TO BIAS AND THE EDITING OF STORIES IN WAYS THAT CRITICS ARGUE REFLECT CERTAIN IDEOLOGICAL, POLITICAL, OR CULTURAL INFLUENCES.
FOR EXAMPLE, ARTICLES RELATED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC HAVE BEEN SUBJECTS OF INTENSE EDITING DISPUTES, WITH CRITICS ACCUSING WIKIPEDIA OF ALLOWING MISINFORMATION OR BIASED PORTRAYALS. THIS INCLUDES ARTICLES ABOUT VACCINES, LOCKDOWN MEASURES, AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SARS-COV-2 VIRUS.
IN THE WAKE OF RUSSIA’S 2022 INVASION OF UKRAINE — WIKIPEDIA’S COVERAGE OF THE WAR FACED SCRUTINY, PARTICULARLY FROM RUSSIAN STATE-BACKED CRITICS WHO ACCUSED THE PLATFORM OF ANTI-RUSSIAN BIAS.
OVER THE YEARS, THE WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION DEFENDED ITS NON-PROFIT MODEL AND ITS RELIANCE ON DONATIONS. THE FOUNDATION EMPHASIZED THAT THEIR MISSION IS TO PROVIDE FREE KNOWLEDGE TO THE WORLD, WITHOUT ADVERTISING OR PAYWALLS, IN ORDER TO REMAIN INDEPENDENT.
IT’S UNCLEAR HOW MUSK’S COMMENTS WILL IMPACT WIKIPEDIA’S FUNDRAISING.
